Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 77% better in War Thunder than FX-8300 - 230 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €73.57 vs €195.09
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €195.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74264 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |