Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Ryzen 3 3200G - 214 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €74.07 vs €210.77
- Up to 61% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - €0.38 vs €0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
38%
Price, €
€210.77
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18608 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
196
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |