Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i3-10100 - 214 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €90.91 vs €195.09
- Up to 51% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - €0.45 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
49.45054945054945%
Price, €
€195.09
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €195.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
93.92523364485982%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
65.23330283623055%
Multi-Core
4215
49.13160041962933%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |