Buy on Amazon
€195.09
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Athlon 3000G - 184 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €80.0 vs €195.09
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Prozessor 6 Kerne bis zu 4,9 GHz entsperrt LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipsatz) 125W
Buy for €195.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74300 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
43.77859103385178%
Multi-Core
1975
23.02133115747756%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
