Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 316 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €69.0 vs €151.36
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-9400F - €0.37 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 17% better in F1 23 than Athlon 3000G - 218 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15721 minutes ago
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |