Buy on Amazon
€69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 776 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - €69.0 vs €177.5
- Up to 61% better value when playing Control than Core i5-8400 - €0.34 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Athlon 3000G - 202 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16673 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-8400 Prozessor (9 MB Cache, bis zu 4,00 GHz)
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
