Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €69.0 vs €199.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-10700F - €0.58 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15754 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
38%
Price, €
€199.95
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |