Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Athlon 3000G vs Core i7-10700F

Athlon 3000G vs Core i7-10700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Athlon 3000G

3.5 GHz | 2-core

AMD Athlon 3000G Logo
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel

Buy for 69 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 15754 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F

2.9 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Intel Core i7-10700F (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110700F Schwarz

Buy for 199.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 15754 minutes ago

AMD Athlon 3000G

3.5 GHz | 2-core

AMD Athlon 3000G Logo
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel

Buy for 69 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 15754 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F

2.9 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Intel Core i7-10700F (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110700F Schwarz

Buy for 199.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 15754 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.

Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G

  • Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €69.0 vs €199.95
  • Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-10700F - €0.58 vs €1.51 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F

  • Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - 132 vs 118 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor.
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

AMD Athlon 3000G Logo
Athlon 3000G

Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019


FPS

118

89%

Value, €/FPS

€0.58/FPS

100%

Price, €

€69

100%

Value Winner

AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel

Buy for 69 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 15754 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

132

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.51/FPS

38%

Price, €

€199.95

34%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110700F Schwarz

Buy for 199.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 15754 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

AMD Athlon 3000G Logo
Athlon 3000G

Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Athlon 3000G Logo
Athlon 3000G

Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019


Single-Core

957

59%

Multi-Core

1975

27%

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1612

100%

Multi-Core

7231

100%

AMD Athlon 3000G Logo

AMD Athlon 3000G

vs
Intel Core i7-10700F Logo

Intel Core i7-10700F

Nov 20th, 2019Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
AthlonCollectionCore i7
PicassoCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
4Threads
16
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.9 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.8 GHz
35 W
TDP65 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
35.0x
Multiplier29.0x
Radeon Vega 3
Integrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Athlon 3000G or Core i7-10700F

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, 1920 x 1080, Epic

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.