Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1258 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-8400 - 121 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - €154.89 vs €177.5
- Up to 23% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-8400 - €1.28 vs €1.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13066 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |