Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3025 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 23% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610 - 96 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |