Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 and the cheaper Core i5-10400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €147.04 vs €216.77
- Up to 31% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10320 - €1.3 vs €1.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-10400 - 115 vs 113 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
98.26086956521739%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €147.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3778 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
69.14893617021278%
Price, €
€216.77
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |