Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-8109U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 217 days older than Core i3-8109U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i3-8109U - 185 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |