Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G4900 - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €60.24 vs €128.17
- Up to 52% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-7100 - €0.51 vs €1.06 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
117
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |