Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i3-6320 vs Celeron G4900

Core i3-6320 vs Celeron G4900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-6320 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6320 is 945 days older than Celeron G4900.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320

  • Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G4900 - 134 vs 129 FPS
  • Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.
The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i3-6320 Logo
Core i3-6320

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

134

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

129

96%

Value, €/FPS

€0.47/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.24

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151

Buy for 60.24 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 356 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i3-6320 Logo
Core i3-6320

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-6320 Logo
Core i3-6320

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

1298

100%

Multi-Core

2618

100%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

47%

Multi-Core

1051

40%

Intel Core i3-6320 Logo

Intel Core i3-6320

vs
Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

Sep 1st, 2015Release Date
Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i3CollectionCeleron
SkylakeCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
3.9 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.1 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
51 W
TDP54 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
39.0x
Multiplier31.0x
Intel HD 530Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 610
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.