Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6320 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6320 is 945 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G4900 - 134 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |