Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €68.52 vs €496.71
- Up to 85% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700F - €0.41 vs €2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-6100 - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
14%
Price, €
€496.71
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |