Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €68.52 vs €417.11
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-6100 - 132 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75017 minutes ago
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
43.73626373626374%
Multi-Core
2336
13.566409199140484%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |