Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2793 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Core i3-540 - 171 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-540 - €180.0 vs €200.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-540 - €1.05 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17820 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |