Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3766 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-540 - 124 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-540 - €199.95 vs €200.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-540 - €1.61 vs €1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16495 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |