Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €260.31 vs €953.9
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 9 5950X - €1.57 vs €5.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - 177 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
93.78531073446328%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€260.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €260.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44039 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.39/FPS
29.12801484230056%
Price, €
€953.9
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €953.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
73.64093193238922%
Multi-Core
7231
59.470351180195735%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |