Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 269 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
250
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |