Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1218 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €78.99 vs €180.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.63 vs €1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-4150 - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18829 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
44%
Price, €
€180
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |