Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - €78.99 vs €202.65
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10500 - €0.44 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4150 - 190 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17910 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
41%
Price, €
€202.65
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |