Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2793 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-350M - 403 vs 363 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
403
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |