Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1823 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €25.06 vs €183.04
- Up to 84% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.16 vs €0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Core i3-3220 - 185 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
16%
Price, €
€183.04
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €183.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |