Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2384 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €62.99 vs €183.04
- Up to 63% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.25 vs €0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i3-2120 - 271 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
253
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
36%
Price, €
€183.04
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €183.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |