Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i7-965 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - €66.63 vs €216.6
- Up to 69% better value when playing Control than Core i3-10105T - €0.33 vs €1.08 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
30%
Price, €
€216.6
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 416 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
199
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 416 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |