Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-2600S - 291 vs 276 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - €75.84 vs €216.6
- Up to 64% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-10105T - €0.27 vs €0.74 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
291
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
36%
Price, €
€216.6
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
276
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |