Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 539 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105T - 189 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - €106.58 vs €216.6
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105T - €0.56 vs €1.18 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €106.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |