Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 219 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10100 - 278 vs 276 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - €109.39 vs €231.18
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3500X - €0.4 vs €0.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
48%
Price, €
€231.18
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |