Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 1475 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700X - 184 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - €128.16 vs €216.6
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105T - €0.71 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
60%
Price, €
€216.6
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
180
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |