Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2024 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 134 vs 122 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |