Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 602 days older than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 5 2400G - 669 vs 668 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
668
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €124.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |