Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3240T - 111 vs 108 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
