Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 1386 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
92.16494845360825%
Multi-Core
971
57.69459298871064%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |