Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €53.15 vs €210.77
- Up to 69% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-11600K - €0.23 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 285 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13345 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
31%
Price, €
€210.77
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |