Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €51.75 vs €228.23
- Up to 74% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-13400 - €0.31 vs €1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 13% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3900 - 191 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for €228.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |