Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - €52.34 vs €199.9
- Up to 64% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 7600X - €0.34 vs €0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 51 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 212 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Buy for €199.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |