Buy on Amazon
€66.63
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-965 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-965 is 1477 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Performs up to 54% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1610T - 60 vs 39 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
