Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1550 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610T - 85 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €104.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10644 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |