Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 694 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610T - 212 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
338
57.97598627787307%
Multi-Core
594
32.79955825510768%
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
