Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1352 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700F - 216 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €464.80 vs €880.71
- Up to 54% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700F - €2.15 vs €4.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €880.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€464.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €464.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |