Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1253 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-9700F - 139 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €382.89 vs €880.71
- Up to 62% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-9700F - €2.75 vs €7.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €880.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €382.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |