Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 1721 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - 140 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €237.99 vs €880.71
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - €1.70 vs €6.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €880.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €237.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |