Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1253 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-9700F - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €392.14 vs €880.71
- Up to 61% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-9700F - €2.04 vs €5.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €880.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€392.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |