Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 1352 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-9700F - 411 vs 354 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €489.00 vs €880.71
- Up to 52% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-9700F - €1.19 vs €2.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €880.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
411
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |