Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 675 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 29% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 188 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |