Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2377 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-6200 - 139 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Colfax | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 3 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
