Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
