Buy on Amazon
€399.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 202 days older than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700F - 179 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €399.99 vs €501.8
- Up to 21% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700F - €2.23 vs €2.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2920X 3.5GHz 12-Core 24 Gewinde 32MB Cache TR4 Sockel OEM, YD292XA8UC9AF
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 460 minutes ago
INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohne Prozessor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €501.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
