Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €399.99 vs €558.79
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 45% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 162 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €3.45 vs €3.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
69%
Value, €/FPS
€3.57/FPS
96%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8299 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€558.79
71%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €558.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |