Buy on Amazon
€496.71
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 107 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €180.62 vs €496.71
- Up to 59% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-9700F - €1.92 vs €4.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.64/FPS
41%
Price, €
€496.71
36%
FPS Winner
INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohne Prozessor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 330 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
94
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
Value Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1900X 4.0GH
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 330 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
